Sunday, December 24, 2017

CHRISTMAS DAY 2017 – THE UPLIFTING POWER OF CHRIST

CHRISTMAS DAY 2017 – THE UPLIFTING POWER OF CHRIST

 

CHRISTMAS DAY 2017 - THE UPLIFTING POWER OF CHRIST


 

CHRISTMAS DAY 2017 –  THE UPLIFTING POWER OF CHRIS: HUMAN EXISTENCE AND THE GAME OF CHESS:

I view human existence as a game of chess. Depending upon the nature of the opponent, human existence faces challenges from several directions. Its not easy to anticipate the challenges and man may or may not be able to escape from the danger posed to his existence. 

ms-clipboard-file://C:/Users/Rudra/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.Office.OneNote_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/msohtmlclip/clip_image001.jpg

CHRIST – THE DIVINE CHESS PLAYER

The popular game of Chess is played on a Chessboard by two players each with 16 pieces. The game pieces have varying abilities of movement over the Chessboard. The piece identified as 'King' can move in all directions but can only move by one space during a given move.  

Board Game Chess

 Human Existence could be viewed as a Game of Chess. If I am the player, who would be my opponent?

chess game-king moves one space

 

In the Game of Chess, the King moves one space in any direction.

The object of the Game of Chess is to 'Checkmate' the opponent player's King. The move that is known as 'Checkmate' wins the Chess game by checking the opponent's King so that it cannot be protected. The condition of the King after such a move indicates complete defeat or that the King is dead.

chess game -checkmate

 

The move known as 'Checkmate' – Its relevance to Human Existence

Human Existence could be compared to the Game of Chess. A variety of physical, chemical, and biological factors constantly challenge human existence. The man learns to survive by making the necessary moves and by deploying all of his defensive mechanisms and resources. During his life's journey, man eventually finds himself in a position without any escape route. Just like the 'Checkmated' King, man may get cornered in a situation which is beyond his control. The Chess game pieces have no ability other than the movement that is allowed by the rules of the Game. Unlike the Chess Game, the man whose existence is 'Checkmated', the man whose existence is undefended; the man who is not capable of making any more moves to protect his own existence, may get rescued by a 'Uplifting Power'; and such an 'Upward' move is not described in the Game of Chess.     

MAN vs GOD – THE JOY OF GETTING 'CHECKMATED'  :

ms-clipboard-file://C:/Users/Rudra/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.Office.OneNote_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/msohtmlclip/clip_image005.jpg

MAN vs GOD – THE JOY OF GETTING 'CHECKMATED'.

ms-clipboard-file://C:/Users/Rudra/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.Office.OneNote_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/msohtmlclip/clip_image006.jpg

IN HIS AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 'SURPRISED BY JOY, C.S. LEWIS DESCRIBED A GAME OF CHESS.

 Clive Staples Lewis ( 1898 – 1963 ), Oxford and Cambridge Scholar, novelist, writer of stories for children, and  Literary Critic, in his Autobiographical Sketch titled 'Surprised by Joy' has visualized his existence as that of a 'Divine Pursuit'. It is not man who searches and eventually finds God. It is rather God who pursues the man throughout his life's moves. God is the one who searches for man and not vice versa. God goes about seeking the souls that are His. If man wanders off, God goes to man in order to reconcile him. God's searching for man is serious and is not ostensible. If life could be described as  Man vs  God Chess Game; God skillfully  places the man in a position which gives no option of escape and finally God captures man. C.S. Lewis has entitled the penultimate chapter of his Autobiography as "Checkmate". Lewis describes God as the Divine Chess player who gradually maneuvers him into an impossible position. "All over the board my pieces were in the most disadvantageous positions. Soon I could no longer cherish even the illusion that the initiative lay with me. My Adversary began to make His final moves." When God is the Divine Chess player, getting 'Checkmated' is only a moment of great Joy. The man who is defeated, the man who is pursued, and the man who is out maneuvered, is saved by the 'Uplifting Power' of Mercy, Grace, and Compassion of the Divine Chess player.     

THE UPLIFTING POWER OF CHRIST:

ms-clipboard-file://C:/Users/Rudra/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.Office.OneNote_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/msohtmlclip/clip_image007.jpg

THE UPLIFTING POWER OF CHRIST

In the New Testament Book of the Gospel according to John, in Chapter 10, Jesus has described Himself. In verse 11, He states : "I am the Good Shepherd, the Good Shepherd lays down his life for the sheep." And He further clarifies in verses 14 and 15 by stating : "I am the Good Shepherd; I know my sheep and my sheep know me – just as the Father knows me and I know the Father – and I lay down my life for the sheep."

ms-clipboard-file://C:/Users/Rudra/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.Office.OneNote_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/msohtmlclip/clip_image008.jpg

THE BOOK OF LUKE, CHAPTER 19, VERSE 10 : "FOR THE SON OF MAN CAME TO SEEK AND TO SAVE WHAT WAS LOST."

 THE SHEPHERD AND HIS FLOCK  :     

As the shepherd marches ahead, the sheep of his flock follow him from behind and recognize him by the commands of his voice. In the Book of Matthew, Chapter 18, verses 12 to 14 , Jesus describes the Parable of the Lost Sheep : "What do you think ? If a man owns a hundred sheep, and one of them wanders away, will he not leave the ninety-nine on the hills and go to look for the one that wandered off ? And if he finds it, I tell you the truth, he is happier about that one sheep than about the ninety-nine that did not wander off."  God is not really willing that any of us should be lost. In case we choose to wander off, He is willing to search for us, find us and take us back to His Home. And after saving the lost sheep, Jesus tells about the shepherd : "Rejoice with me ; I have found my lost sheep." ( Book of Luke, Chapter 15, verses 3 – 7 ). God actually delights Himself by finding the lost among us.     

THE PROBLEM OF BLACK SHEEP  :

ms-clipboard-file://C:/Users/Rudra/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.Office.OneNote_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/msohtmlclip/clip_image009.jpg

BLACK SHEEP – WHAT IS THE PROBLEM ???

The problem of "Black Sheep" is not about its color. The word 'black' reflects the discredited status of the sheep. Black Sheep means a member of a family or group regarded as not so respectable or successful as the rest. The flock rejects one of its own, and the discredited member is described as the "Black Sheep". The Shepherd tends to His flock of sheep who recognize Him and follow Him. In the Book of John, Chapter 10, verse 9, Jesus describes Himself as the Gate of His sheep pen, and said : "If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture." What happens to the "Black Sheep" who is not a member of His flock?  The non-member could be described as a disbeliever. Who would rescue the "Black Sheep" that has wandered off ? As a discredited member of my community and my country, the concept of "Black Sheep" and its "Uplift" is of a great interest and concern to me.

 

christ holding black sheep

 

THE PROBLEM OF "BLACK SHEEP" – WOULD THE GOOD SHEPHERD LOOK FOR LOST "BLACK SHEEP"?

Jesus assures us that He is aware of the existence of sheep that may not belong to His sheep pen. In the Book of John, Chapter 10, verse 16, He gives a sense of great hope to others who may not know Him and may not live under His protection : "I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to My voice, and there shall be One flock and One Shepherd.

St-Takla.org

JESUS WOULD ALSO FIND THE OTHER SHEEP THAT ARE NOT OF HIS SHEEP PEN. THERE SHALL BE ONE FLOCK AND ONE SHEPHERD.

THE JOY OF CHRISTMAS  :

King of Kings and Lord of Lords

 

KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS – THE BOOK OF REVELATIONS, CHAPTER 19, VERSE 16

The Joy of Christmas comes from the fact that God knows you, and He takes pleasure in finding you and He gets you back into His Protection even if you have wandered away from Him and got lost. He is aware of the sheep that are not in His sheep pen. Even the "Black Sheep" belong to His sheep pen and He would rejoice when He rescues one lost sheep.    

Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada,

Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A., 48104-4162     

Bhavanajagat.Org

Jesus as King of Kings and Lord of Lords

 

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

SEPTUAGENARIAN AWAITS ARRIVAL OF 'GOOD SAMARITAN' ON CHRISTMAS DAY

SEPTUAGENARIAN AWAITS ARRIVAL OF 'GOOD SAMARITAN' ON CHRISTMAS DAY

 

SEPTUAGENARIAN AWAITS ARRIVAL OF 'GOOD SAMARITAN' ON CHRISTMAS DAY

Good Samaritan

 

I am presenting the story of Senior Alien who lives in the U.S. without retirement option. Like many other senior citizens, Senior Alien works in a job where the pension plan failed to offer retirement income as the plan lost his savings due to improper investment choices made by the plan administrators. Secondly, Senior Alien is disqualified from receiving his monthly retirement benefit from Social Security due to rules imposed by PRWORA of 1996.

 

PRVVORA  In 1996, Congress passed and President Clinton signed The Personal  Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of  1996. Among other things, the Act created two categories of  aliens: qualified and unqualified.

 

The constitutional validity of regulations imposed by PRWORA is not known as it is not tested in any U.S. Court of Law. In my analysis, PRWORA imposes Involuntary Servitude, Forced Labor, Compulsory Service and Slavery as Senior Alien is not allowed the Right to his own earnings held in Public Trust Fund administered by Social Security Administration.

In my view, Americans are alienated from virtue called Mercy while they generously contribute to various charitable organizations to claim the benefit of tax deduction.

 

On Monday, December 25, Christmas Day of 2017, Senior Alien simply awaits the arrival of 'Good Samaritan' that Jesus described in a parable. There is no hope of Jesus returning in a few years and for that reason, Senior Alien has no hope to quit working in a few years.

 

Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada

BHAVANAJAGAT.ORG

Good Samaritan

 

'I HOPE I CAN QUIT WORKING IN A FEW YEARS' : A PREVIEW OF THE U.S. WITHOUT PENSIONS

 

Clipped from: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/%e2%80%98i-hope-i-can-quit-working-in-a-few-years%e2%80%99-a-preview-of-the-us-without-pensions/ar-BBHalTy?li=BBnb7Kz

a man preparing food in a kitchen: Tom Coomer makes a pot of coffee at his home in Wagoner, Okla., after a day of work at Walmart.

© NICK OXFORD/Nick Oxford for The Washington Post Tom Coomer makes a pot of coffee at his home in Wagoner, Okla., after a day of work at Walmart. So here he is at 79, working full time at Walmart. During each eight-hour shift, he stands at the store entrance greeting customers, telling a joke and fetching a "buggy." Or he is stationed at the exit, checking receipts and the shoppers that trip the theft alarm.

"As long as I sit down for about 10 minutes every hour or two, I'm fine," he said during a break. Diagnosed with spinal stenosis in his back, he recently forwarded a doctor's note to managers. "They got me a stool."

The way major U.S. companies provide for retiring workers has been shifting for about three decades, with more dropping traditional pensions every year. The first full generation of workers to retire since this turn offers a sobering preview of a labor force more and more dependent on their own savings for retirement.

Years ago, Coomer and his co-workers at the Tulsa plant of McDonnell-Douglas, the famed airplane maker, were enrolled in the company pension, but in 1994, with an eye toward cutting retirement costs, the company closed the plant. Now, The Washington Post found in a review of those 998 workers, that even though most of them found new jobs, they could never replace their lost pension benefits and many are facing financial struggle in their old age: One in seven has in their retirement years filed for bankruptcy, faced liens for delinquent bills, or both, according to public records.

Those affected are buried by debts incurred for credit cards, used cars, health care and sometimes, the college educations of their children.

Some have lost their homes.

And for many of them, even as they reach beyond 70, real retirement is elusive. Although they worked for decades at McDonnell-Douglas, many of the septuagenarians are still working, some full time.

Lavern Combs, 73, works the midnight shift loading trucks for a company that delivers for Amazon. Ruby Oakley, 74, is a crossing guard. Charles Glover, 70, is a cashier at Dollar General. Willie Sells, 74, is a barber. Leon Ray, 76, buys and sells junk.

a man holding a red stop sign sitting on the side of a road: Former McDonnell Douglas employee Ruby Oakley works five days a week as a crossing guard for an elementary school in Tulsa, Okla.

© NICK OXFORD/Nick Oxford for The Washington Post Former McDonnell Douglas employee Ruby Oakley works five days a week as a crossing guard for an elementary school in Tulsa, Okla. "I planned to retire years ago," Sells says from behind his barber's chair, where he works five days a week. He once had a job in quality control at the aircraft maker and was employed there 29 years. "I thought McDonnell-Douglas was a blue-chip company — that's what I used to tell people. 'They're a hip company and they're not going to close.' But then they left town — and here I am still working. Thank God I had a couple of clippers."

Likewise, Oakley, a crossing guard at an elementary school, said she took the job to supplement her Social Security.

"It pays some chump change — $7 an hour," Oakley said. She has told local officials they should pay better. "I use it for gas money. I like the people. But we have to get out there in the traffic, and the people at the city think they're doing the senior citizens a favor by letting them work like this."

Glover works the cash register and does stocking at a Dollar General store outside Tulsa to make ends meet. After working 27 years at McDonnell-Douglas, Glover found work at a Whirlpool factory, and then at another place that makes robots for inspecting welding, and also picked up some jobs doing AutoCAD drawing.

a man in a military uniform standing in front of a building: Leon Ray stands amid a collection of junk that he restores and recycles at his home in Claremore, Okla.

© NICK OXFORD/Nick Oxford for The Washington Post Leon Ray stands amid a collection of junk that he restores and recycles at his home in Claremore, Okla.

"I hope I can quit working in a few years, but the way it looks right now, I can't see being able to," Glover said recently between customers. "I had to refinance my home after McDonnell-Douglas closed. I still owe about 12 years of mortgage payments."

For some, financial shortfalls have grown acute enough that they have precipitated liens for delinquent bills or led people to file for bankruptcy. None were inclined to talk about their debts.

"It's a struggle, just say that," said one woman, 72, who filed for bankruptcy in 2013. "You just try to get by."

A perk that became too costly

The notion of pensions — and the idea that companies should set aside money for retirees — didn't last long. They really caught on in the mid-20th century, but today, except among government employers, the traditional pension now seems destined to be an artifact of U.S. labor history.

The first ones offered by a private company were those handed out by American Express, back when it was stagecoach delivery service. That was in 1875. The idea didn't exactly spread like wildfire, but under union pressure in the middle of the last century, many companies adopted a plan. By the 1980s, the trend had profoundly reshaped retirement for Americans, with a large majority of full-time workers at medium and large companies getting traditional pension coverage, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

Then corporate America changed: Union membership waned. Executive boards, under pressure from financial raiders, focused more intently on maximizing stock prices. And Americans lived longer, making a pension much more expensive to provide.

The average life expectancy in 1950 was 68, meaning that a pension had to pay out only three years past the typical retirement age of 65. Today, average life expectancy is about 79, meaning that the same plan would have to pay out 13 years past typical retirement age. 

Exactly what led corporate America away from pensions is a matter of debate among scholars, but there is little question that they seem destined for extinction, at least in the private sector.

Even as late as the early 1990s, about 60 percent of full-time workers at medium and large companies had pension coverage, according to the government figures. But today only about 24 percent of workers at midsize and large companies have pension coverage, according to the data, and that number is expected to continue to fall as older workers exit the workforce.

In place of pensions, companies and investment advisers urge employees to open retirement accounts. The basic idea is that workers will manage their own retirement funds, sometimes with a little help from their employers, sometimes not. Once they reach retirement age, those accounts are supposed to supplement whatever Social Security might pay. (Today, Social Security provides only enough for a bare-bones budget, about $14,000 a year on average.)

The trouble with expecting workers to save on their own is that almost half of U.S. families have no such retirement account, according the Fed's 2016 Survey of Consumer Finances.

Of those who do have retirement accounts, moreover, their savings are far too scant to support a typical retirement. The median account, among workers at the median income level, is about $25,000.

"The U.S. retirement system, and the workers and retirees it was designed to help, face major challenges," according to an October report by the Government Accountability Office. "Traditional pensions have become much less common, and individuals are increasingly responsible for planning and managing their own retirement savings accounts."

The GAO further warned that "many households are ill-equipped for this task and have little or no retirement savings."

The GAO recommended that Congress consider creating an independent commission study the U.S. retirement system.

"If no action is taken, a retirement crisis could be looming," it said.

'We were stunned'

Employees at McDonnell-Douglas in the early '90s enjoyed one of the more generous types of pensions, those known as "30 and out." Employees with 30 years on the job could retire with a full pension once they reached age 55.

But, as the employees would later learn, the generosity of those pensions made them, in lean times, an appealing target for cost-cutters.

Those lean times for McDonnell-Douglas began in earnest in the early '90s. Some plants closed. But for the remaining employees, including those at the Tulsa plant, executives said, there was hope: if Congress allowed the $6 billion sale of 72 F-15s to Saudi Arabia, the new business would rescue the company. In fact, the company said in its 1991 annual report, it would save 7,000 jobs.

To help win approval for the sale, Tulsa employees wrote letters to politicians. They held a rally with local politicians and the governor of Oklahoma. And eventually, in September 1992, President George H.W. Bush approved the sale. It seemed that the Tulsa plant had weathered the storm.

The headline in the Oklahoman, one of the state's largest newspapers, proclaimed: "F-15 Sale to Saudi Arabia Saves Jobs of Tulsa Workers."

But it hadn't. Within months, executives at the company again turned to cost-cutting. They considered closing a plant in Florida, another in Mesa, Ariz., or the Tulsa facility. Tulsa, it was noted, had the oldest hourly employees — the average employee was 51 and had worked there for about 20 years. Many were close to getting a full pension, and that meant closing it would yield bigger savings in retirement costs.

"One day in December '93 they came on the loudspeaker and said, 'Attention, employees,' Coomer recalled. "We were going to close. We were stunned. Just ran around like a bunch of chickens."

A few years later, McDonnell-Douglas, which continued to struggle, merged with Boeing. But the employees had taken their case to court, and in 2001, a federal judge agreed that McDonnell-Douglas had illegally considered the pensions in its decision to close the plant. The employees case, presented by attorneys Joe Farris and Mike Mulder, showed that the company had tracked pension savings in its plant closure decisions. 

The judge found McDonnell-Douglas, moreover, had offered misleading testimony in its defense of the plant closing. The judge, Sven Erik Holmes, blasted the company for a "corporate culture of mendacity."

Employees eventually won settlements — about $30,000 was typical. It helped carry people over to find new jobs. But the amount was limited to cover the benefits of three years of employment — and it was far less than the loss in pension and retiree health benefits. Because their pension benefits accrued most quickly near retirement age, the pensions they receive are only a small fraction of what they would have had they worked until full eligibility.

"People went to work at these places thinking they'll work there their whole lives," Farris said, noting that the pensions held great appeal to the staff. "Their trust and loyalty, though, was not reciprocated."

Dreaming of work

The economic effects were, of course, immediate.

The workers, most of them over 50, had to find jobs.

Some enrolled in classes for new skills, but then struggled to find jobs in their new fields. They wondered, amid rejections, whether younger workers were favored.

Several found jobs at other industrial plants. One started a chicken farm for Tyson. Another took a job on a ranch breaking horses.

The Post acquired a list of the 998 employees, reviewed public records for them, and interviewed more than 25.

Of those interviewed, all found work of one kind or another. Yet all but a handful said their new wages were only about half of what they had been making. Typically, their pay dropped in half, from about $20 per hour to $10 per hour.

The pay cut was tough, and it made saving for retirement close to impossible. In fact, it has made retirement itself near impossible for some — they must work to pay the bills.

A few said, though, they work because they detest idleness, and persist in jobs that would seem to require remarkable endurance.

Combs, for example, works the graveyard shift, begins each workday at 1:30 a.m. His days off are Thursday and Sunday. He worked 25 years at McDonnell-Douglas, and more than 20 loading trucks.

He shrugs off the difficulty.

"I don't want to sit around and play checkers and get fat," Combs says. "I used to pick cotton in 90-degree heat. This is easy."

Coomer, too, even if he would have preferred to retire, seems to genuinely enjoy his work. At Walmart, his natural cheerfulness is put to good use.

"Hi, Tom, how are you?" a customer on a motorized scooter, one of many who greet him by name, asks on her way out.

"Doing good ... beautiful day," he says, smiling warmly.

Later he explains his geniality.

"I like to talk to people! I like to visit with them. I can talk to anyone. I've always been like that, since I was a kid."

When he sees someone looking glum, he tells them a joke.

Why does Santa Claus have three gardens?

So he can hoe, hoe, hoe.

"People really like that one," he says.

Coomer grew up on a farm in Broken Arrow, got married when he was 17 — his wife was 15 — and says he's always liked work.

"I really loved working at McDonnell-Douglas," he says, One time, he says, he worked 36 days straight: 11 hours on the weekdays and eight hours on Saturdays and Sundays. He joked that the factory was his home address. All along, for his 29 years there, he had his eye on the pension. And then, for the most part, it was gone.

After the plant closed, Coomer worked as a security guard. Then he worked for a friend who had a pest-control company. When that slowed down, he picked up seasonal work at the city, doing some mowing and chipping.

Then came Walmart.

Soon, he said, he expects to cut back from full time to about three days a week.

Along with his Walmart check, he gets $300 a month from the McDonnell-Douglas pension. Had he been able to continue working at McDonnell-Douglas, he calculates that he would have gotten about five times that amount.

"After they shut the plant down, I would dream that I was back at McDonnell-Douglas and going to get my pension," Coomer recalled. "In the dream, I would try to clock in but I couldn't find my time card. And then I'd wake up."

In the dream, he would have retired years ago.

Good Samaritan

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

Friday, December 22, 2017

TIBET AWARENESS - DISAPPEARING LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY OF TIBET

TIBET AWARENESS - DISAPPEARING LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY OF TIBET

TIBET AWARENESS - DISAPPEARING LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY OF TIBET
Tibet Awareness - Disappearing Linguistic Diversity of Tibet

Tibetan Identity evolved over centuries in response to Natural Conditions that impact human life. Since 1950, Communist China's occupation and colonization of Tibet is transforming Tibetan Identity in numerous manners endangering both Nature and its denizens.

Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada
Doom Dooma Doomsayer

Tibet Awareness - Disappearing Linguistic Diversity of Tibet

THE INCREDIBLE LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY OF TIBET IS DISAPPEARING

Clipped from: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/incredible-linguistic-diversity-tibet-disappearing-180967513/

Thanks to national schooling and the Internet, many of the plateau's unique languages are in danger

Tibet Awareness - Disappearing Linguistic Diversity of Tibet.
In a recent presentation held at the National Museum of Natural History, University of Melbourne researcher Gerald Roche called attention to 21 minority languages spoken in villages across Tibet. (Wikimedia Commons)
Tibet may be best known for its bounty of ancient Buddhist monasteries and stark natural beauty—but it's also blessed with a vast diversity of languages. The Tibetan Plateau is home to more than a dozen distinct local tongues, many of which come with their own elaborate character systems. Unfortunately, thanks to the growth of internet infrastructure and state-sponsored education, many of these lesser-spoken languages are now on the brink of extinction, says University of Melbourne anthropologist Gerald Roche.
As part of ongoing research conducted by the Smithsonian Center for Folk life and Cultural Heritage on issues of language diversity and cultural sustainability, Roche delivered a presentation last Monday on Tibetan language and his research on its decline. In a 2014 paper titled "The Vitality of Tibet's Minority Languages in the 21st Century," Roche notes that dozens of languages are spoken on the Plateau but that only "230,000 of the 6.2 million Tibetans in China do not speak Tibetan." He finds that the minority languages in Tibet are generally spoken by very few people, while Tibetan is known to nearly everyone.
From a language preservationist's perspective, this is a precarious situation. The findings Roche laid out, which synthesized the work of several linguists with expertise in disparate areas of the Plateau, reveal the vibrant tapestry of language in Tibet while also highlighting its fragility.
The danger of the minority languages of Tibet disappearing completely is not merely speculative. In 2014, the BBC reported that "over the past century alone, about 400 languages—one every three months—have gone extinct, and most linguists estimate that 50 percent of the world's remaining 6,500 languages will be gone by the end of this century." These languages are tied to the histories of peoples, and their loss serves to erase time-honored traditions , says Roche.
By the conservative assessment of the Chinese government, 14 languages beyond standardized Tibetan are spoken within Tibet—one language for each official ethnic minority region. A holistic survey of pertinent English-language academic literature, however, yields a much larger estimate. In a study published this May , Roche concludes that as many as 52 linguistically distinct languages may be spoken on the Plateau.
In general, a language can be thought of as encompassing both grammatical elements and a lexicon of words. It may be spoken or written, and in the modern world is almost always both (though a few of the Tibetan minority languages Roche has studied were historically spoken only). Yet Roche says there is a strong case to be made that even "Tibetan" itself is, in actuality, not a single language—its three major branches, which locals call "dialects," are not mutually intelligible when spoken, despite relying on the same written character.
Even more striking are the differences between minority languages and Tibetan. Minority languages are also often dismissed within Tibet as bizarre "dialects," but Roche notes that this is often tantamount to calling "Italian a dialect of Swedish." These include what Roche terms "enclaved languages," which are officially recognized by the Chinese government within narrow geographical limits in Tibet, "extraterritorial languages," which are officially recognized only in locations outside of Tibet, and myriad "unrecognized languages," whose existence is ignored by the Chinese establishment.
In his remarks, Roche homed in on a sample set of 21 languages spoken within Tibetan villages. A dozen of these are endangered, meaning they are steadily losing speakers. "The [speaker] population is declining," Roche says, "and it's declining because people are no longer speaking those languages to their children." This is largely the result of pressures to rally behind standardized Tibetan as a source of Tibetan pride in response to the encroachment of Chinese beginning during the reign of Mao Zedong.
A handful of the languages in Roche's dataset are "moribund"—very nearly forgotten, with no real hope for salvation. Roche notes that, in the case of one of these languages, "there is an argument between the two linguists studying it as to whether the language has nine or zero fluent speakers remaining. That's what we're talking about when we talk about moribund languages."
Tibet Awareness - Disappearing Linguistic Diversity of Tibet.
A relief map of the Asian continent. The expanse of brown in China is the Tibetan Plateau, whose exceedingly high mean elevation has earned it the nickname "The Roof of the World." (Wikimedia Commons)
Roche has personal experience with the Manikacha language, which is spoken by approximately 8,000 individuals across four villages in a valley on the northeastern Plateau. According to his unpublished survey data, roughly one third of are no longer transmitting the language to their children. He traces this back to the late 1950s, when Mao's China began forcibly instructing the Manikacha speakers in standardized Tibetan. Even the Chairman's famous Little Red Book was distributed in Tibetan.
In the subsequent years, Tibetan has further asserted itself in popular media and local state- sponsored schools. "Given that the Manikacha speakers consider themselves Tibetan," Roche says, "now they are under a lot of pressure to prove that by speaking 'good Tibetan' like all the other Tibetans in their region."
Andrew Frankel, a researcher at the University of Virginia's Tibet Center who spent three years teaching English in the same general part of the Plateau, has firsthand experience with this sort of assimilation. Though several of his students were raised in homes that favored minority languages, in between classes the children would invariably speak Tibetan. The decision was a practical one: After all, most of their peers would not recognize Manikacha or the like.
"For the majority of their friends," says Frankel, "Tibetan would have been the lingua franca they would have spoken together."
State schools tend to smooth over differences between communities and encourage allegiance to a single mother tongue, says Frankel. "Schooling has become ever more pervasive," he says, a shift that in its earlier stages caused significant alarm in households whose primary language was not Tibetan. Even among families where standard Tibetan was spoken at home, many were skeptical of the pressures at school to communicate in Chinese.
Ten years ago, it was common for parents to resist sending their children to school. "There was a widespread perception that state schools were problematic—you didn't really learn your native language there," says Frankel. A decade later, though, most have given in: "The amount of time kids spend in state schools has increased exponentially. And in those state institutions, they are not speaking their village languages with any regularity."
This situation is unlikely to change, Frankel says, adding that "state schooling has become a gatekeeper for employment, especially in western areas of China."
How, then, can we hope to preserve Tibet's linguistic richness for future generations? For Roche, the answer lies in large part in the behavior of powerful international allies of the Tibetan people—including the United States. Our country's stance towards Tibet emphasizes the preservation of standard Tibetan but fails to address the numerous other languages spoken on the Plateau, he says.
Tibet is not a land of a single language, or even of the 14 whose existence is acknowledged by China. The myriad minority languages of Tibet need help to have a fighting chance at survival. Roche believes it is incumbent on the United States and other friends of Tibet to "use whatever means possible to gain recognition for these languages: recognition of the fact they exist, that they have unique needs, that they have value, and that they deserve respect." 
Tibet Awareness - Disappearing Linguistic Diversity of Tibet.


Wednesday, December 20, 2017

FROM VICTORY DAY TO FORFEIT OF FREEDOM – MY JOURNEY FROM DECEMBER 16, 1971 TO DECEMBER 16, 2017



FROM VICTORY DAY TO FORFEIT OF FREEDOM – MY JOURNEY FROM DECEMBER 16, 1971 TO DECEMBER 16, 2017
FROM VICTORY DAY TO FORFEIT OF FREEDOM – MY JOURNEY FROM DECEMBER 16, 1971 TO DECEMBER 16, 2017

From Victory Day to Forfeit of Freedom. My Journey From December 16, 1971 to December 16, 2017.

I participated in Bangladesh Ops, code-named 'Operation Eagle', initiating Liberation of Bangladesh with military action in Chittagong Hill Tracts, starting from November 03/04, 1971.
From Victory Day to Forfeit of Freedom.

In my expectation, I visualized Operation Eagle as physical and mental training to prepare me to fulfill my challenging military mission that aims at securing Freedom, Democracy, Peace, and Justice in Occupied Tibet.

From Victory Day to Forfeit of Freedom.

Today, I need to take stock of the ground realities. Both the United States, and India have missed several opportunities to dispatch me on my military mission. Apparently, people have forfeited Freedom and Liberty in pursuit of wealth and material prosperity which they hope will provide 'Security'.

From Victory Day to Forfeit of Freedom.

Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada
SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA 48104-4162

From Victory Day to Forfeit of Freedom.

VIJAY DIWAS: A TIME TO CELEBRATE AND TAKE STOCK

Clipped from: https://swarajyamag.com/defence/vijay-diwas-a-time-to-celebrate-and-take-stock
From Victory Day to Forfeit of Freedom.
Lt Gen Niazi signing the Instrument of Surrender under the gaze of Lt Gen Aurora. (Indian Navy)
Snapshot
Forty-six years ago today, more than 3,500 warriors of the Indian Army crafted a victory that resulted in the capture of 93,000 Pakistani prisoners of war and delivered a new nation in 14 days.
But how many of the young Indians know that 16 December is marked as Vijay Diwas?
Ask new generation Indians, the predominant group in our nation, what Vijay Diwas is all about and you are more likely to get a blank response. For a few who know anything at all, a war was fought and won, Bangladesh was created and that is all. That over 3,500 warriors of the Indian Armed Forces made the ultimate sacrifice in the war that ended in India's victory on 16 December 1971, that we captured 93,000 Pakistani prisoners of war (PoWs) and delivered a new nation in 14 days of a two front conventional military engagement is hardly known to them.
The 1971 India-Pakistan war saw the execution of a well-considered strategy, evolved by the redoubtable Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw, even as he convinced then prime minister Indira Gandhi and her close cabinet colleagues and aides on the necessity of going slow and not being tempted by the evolving situation in March 1971. The Field Marshal had the professional courage to parry demands and shun any talk of immediate war in early 1971 when the crisis in the then East Pakistan had brewed and spilled over beyond retrieval, triggering the first reactions in South Block.
The backdrop to the situation related to the state of politics in Pakistan where the Bengali Muslims of East Pakistan were clearly resistant to the idea of being subjugated by the dominant Punjabi and Mohajir influence. The issue of language had been the touchy beginning to the standoff between East Pakistan (Bengali speaking and resistant to Urdu) and West Pakistan. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, father of the current Prime Minister of Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina Wajed, was illegally denied his electoral victory in 1970 by Pakistan's ruling coterie, which was influenced by Zulfiqar Bhutto. The crisis spilled into the streets and became a point of no return in March 1971. The Pakistan Army's reign of terror on the hapless Bengalis exacerbated the situation with an initial displacement of a million refugees who spilled across the border into India. The figure progressively moved up to 10 million.
The Field Marshal famously faced the powerful coterie of Indira Gandhi and gave them a lesson in strategy. He reminded them of his demands for an enhanced budget to buy more spares for the tanks and sufficient ammunition for the artillery which had not been granted. He let them know that a war in April or May meant for the standing crop of wheat all over Western India which would be destroyed by movement of the Army thus leading to a major food crisis in India. Among other cautionary, he stated that war in June-August would be a major problem with moving dual task Army formations west to east or vice versa due to the floods and shaky railway infrastructure besides the state of the terrain in East Pakistan.
The prime minister gave in to the Army Chief's advice and trusted him to evolve the war fighting plans should Pakistan decide to go to war. The war finally broke out on 3 December 1971 but preceding that a series of clashes occurred at the borders some of them well above the classical description of patrol and border clashes. The Indian Army followed a simple strategy.
Firstly, the war effort would be focused on the eastern theatre where the impact would have to be decisive; there was total clarity about this.
Secondly, the western front could not be ignored as Pakistan would want India's attention to be diverted and resources divided. The western theatre was largely to be in holding mode but that would not restrict offensive operations where ever opportunities arose.
Thirdly, for the eastern theater the strategy included speedy thrusts, bypassing main opposition which would be contained or masked to allow the main advance to progress unhindered to the identified center of gravity, Dacca.
The early multi-directional threat to Dacca would unnerve the Pakistani military leadership and force it to capitulate. The role of the Indian Air Force was crucial and it led to some decisive actions such as at Longewala (Rajasthan) where a large Armoured column of the Pakistan Army was decimated in the morning after it was brought to a standstill by a single company with two recoilless guns of 23 Punjab. The Indian Air Force also ensured total domination of the air above East Pakistan. The Indian Navy not to be left behind was entrusted the task of intimidating Pakistan with a virtual blockade of Karachi, Pakistan's only port. The Navy went well beyond its brief and achieved total domination of the sea and even raided Karachi harbor with missile attacks.
The Indian forces in the eastern theatre comprised 4 Corps under Lt Gen Sagat Singh, 33 Corps under Lt Gen M L Thapar and the newly raised 2 Corps under Lt Gen T N Raina. In less than 14 days, the Indian troops were at the doorstep of Dacca having bypassed all islands of resistance and making use of the distinct corridors provided by the riverine terrain. A parachute drop of the 2nd Para at Tangail secured the final bridges and crossings enabling the troops to make an early entry into the outskirts of Dacca even as radio messages were transmitted to the Pakistani leadership that further resistance would only result in more bloodshed while a surrender would ensure full safety of troops.
The Pakistan Army as is well known had sufficient stocks of ammunition and other logistics wherewithal. It could have fought long and resisted to the end but devoid of any air power with its forward locations under Indian siege the only thing that the Pakistanis could fight for was their honor and name as a fighting force. Lt Gen A A K Niazi, the overall commander of Pakistani forces in the eastern theatre weighed his options and made the final decision for surrender, the details of which were negotiated by Maj Gen (later Lt Gen) JFR Jacob. The surrender ceremony which was impromptu involved the signing of the surrender document by Lt Gen Niazi and its handing over to Lt Gen Jagjit Aurora, Army Commander Eastern Command. The photograph of the ceremony is now folklore and adorns every military museum, motivation hall and officers mess of the Indian Army.
The western front saw action all along, from Naya Chor in Rajasthan to Turtuk in Ladakh. Some intense armour battles were fought in the Shakargarh Bulge. 10 Para (Commando) now 10 SF under Lt Col Bhawani Singh, MVC conducted a series of raids across the international border in the Barmer sector. 9 Para (Commando) similarly earned glory for its action in Jammu and Kashmir. The Lipa Valley was captured by the famous Dagger Division among many other gains by the Indian Army on the western front.
Among the famous battles of 1971 were Akhaura, Sylhet, Hilli, Basantar, Longewala, Lipa Valley and Naya Chor. There are many heroes of 1971 whose names need to be folklore and whose deeds must be brought to the knowledge of young Indians of today. A nation which does not sufficiently glorify its military heroes is not a nation with sufficient self-esteem. India is surely not in that category as the public loves the Armed Forces, respects them immensely but unfortunately is completely divorced from knowledge about the deeds of the very forces they revere.
The names of 2/Lt Arun Khetarpal, Major Hoshiyar Singh, Flt Lt Nirmaljeet Singh Sekhon and L/Naik Albert Ekka, all winners of the Param Vir Chakra (India's highest wartime award for valor in the face of the enemy) need to be known to India's young. India needs a public relations outreach to educate the public about the sacrifice of its heroes. There are many patriotic organizations which are organizing events to mark Vijay Diwas, but this really needs a major push to make it a movement.
The Indian Armed Forces need to provide an example of doing something different on Vijay Diwas. It would be good to see that along with traditional 'barakhana' and pep talks by commanders which are routine, all units and establishments must undertake an exercise of self-appraisal and identification of strengths and weaknesses. This should be done through an exercise of mutual discussion and consultation with all stakeholders and result in identification of one or two themes from different domains (operations, training, administration, equipment management etc.) to be undertaken for rectification over the next year.
It should be entirely an internal exercise with no checks and in an environment which promotes trust and ability to function unsupervised. Subsequently the Armed Forces should project this model of self-appraisal across the nation for all civil establishments to conduct in the same spirit. Vijay Diwas must ultimately emerge as a day beyond just ceremonials. It should be seen as a day synonymous with victory over inertia and victory over inefficiency.
We can ill-afford to forget the India-Pakistan War of 1971; it is just too important an event in India's post-1947 history. Progressive nations move on and shape their destinies with hard work and initiatives but equally draw inspiration from the achievements of the past. We cannot allow our young not to be aware of our modern day history and therefore much more effort is needed to spread the word of India's military heritage. Fortunately, there is deep interest in this, but not enough people to explain and render assistance to educational institutions in the field of military history and strategic culture. An odd lone ranger is doing it, but it needs to become a movement.
Happy Vijay Diwas to the nation!
From Victory Day to Forfeit of Freedom.


.