Elimination of the Obamacare Act would be a huge win for America's Fiscal Well-being
The US Supreme Court must eliminate the Affordable Care Act for it fails to Protect America From its Pre-Existing Condition
The US Supreme Court must eliminate the Affordable Care Act for it fails to protect America from its pre-existing condition.
The US Supreme Court must eliminate the Affordable Care Act for it fails to protect America from its pre-existing condition.
In my analysis, America cannot afford the expense of the Affordable Care Act. In fact, the Obamacare Act does not protect America from its Pre-Existing Condition. Obamacare offers no remedy to the life-threatening condition impacting the fiscal health of the nation. The Repeal and Replacing the Obamacare Act would be a “Huge Win” for America’s Fiscal Health.
The US Supreme Court must eliminate the Affordable Care Act for it fails to protect America from its pre-existing condition.
The US Supreme Court must eliminate the Affordable Care Act for it fails to protect America from its pre-existing condition.
Trump says elimination of Obamacare would be a ‘win for the USA’
By Mark Moore
September 27, 2020
The US Supreme Court must eliminate the Affordable Care Act for it fails to protect America from its pre-existing condition.
The US Supreme Court must eliminate the Affordable Care Act for it fails to protect America from its pre-existing condition.
President Trump said it would be a “win for the USA” if the Supreme Court eliminates the Affordable Care Act.
“Obamacare will be replaced with a MUCH better, and FAR cheaper, alternative if it is terminated in the Supreme Court. Would be a big WIN for the USA!” the president said Sunday in a tweet.
The statement came as Democratic leaders Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Chuck Schumer claimed the only reason he’s in a rush to get Judge Amy Coney Barrett on the bench is to kill the health-care plan.
“What I am concerned about is anyone that President Trump would have appointed was there to undo the Affordable Care Act. That is why he was in such a hurry,” Pelosi said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on the Affordable Care Act on Nov. 10 — one week after the election.
If Barrett clears the nomination process and is confirmed by election day — Nov. 3 — as the president and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell intend, she would be able to participate in the arguments over the Affordable Care Act.
Pelosi argued Americans would lose health care at a time the coronavirus pandemic has killed more than 200,000 people in the US.
“What matters is what it means personally to the American people. If you have a pre-existing medical condition, that benefit will be gone. If you are a woman, you will be back to a time where being a woman is a pre-existing medical condition. If your adult children are on your policy, no longer will they be and that at time of a pandemic,” she said.
Schumer, at a news conference later Sunday about Trump’s court selection, said Barrett has already criticized Chief Justice John Robert’s 2012 vote upholding the Affordable Care Act, and that a reading of the law should “invalidate” it completely.
“Judge Barrett strongly criticized the ruling to uphold the Affordable Care Act, claiming that if justices read the law the way she does, they would ‘have had to invalidate’ the entire health care law,” the New York Democrat said.
Along with gutting the Affordable Care Act, Schumer said Barrett and the “far-right majority on the court” … “could also turn back the clock on women’s rights and a woman’s right to choose, workers’ rights, voting rights, civil rights, LGBT rights, environmental protections and more.”
The Trump administration and Congress did away with Obamacare’s individual mandate — requiring most Americans to have the plan or pay a penalty — and eliminated the penalty for not having insurance.
Opponents argued that without the penalty the health-care plan was unconstitutional.
“Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute,” Barrett wrote at the time.
“He construed the penalty imposed on those without health insurance as a tax, which permitted him to sustain the statute as a valid exercise of the taxing power.”
Trump, who campaigned on “repealing and replacing” Obamacare during his 2016 campaign, signed a series of executives orders last week to protect pre-existing conditions and introduce a number of affordable health-care options.
“We’re delivering better care with more choice at a much lower cost and working to ensure Americans have access to the care they need,” Trump said of his “America First Health Care Plan” at an event in Charlotte, NC.
The US Supreme Court must eliminate the Affordable Health Care Act for it fails to protect America from its pre-existing condition.
The US Supreme Court must eliminate the Affordable Health Care Act for it fails to protect America from its pre-existing condition.
THE CLINTON CURSE. A BALANCED BUDGET vs FOREIGN DEBT
The Clinton Curse. A Balanced Budget vs Foreign Debt.
The Clinton Curse. A Balanced Budget vs Foreign Debt.
I ask my readers to make the distinction between Budget Deficit and Foreign Debt. I describe the phrase 'The Clinton Curse' from my reading the Book of Deuteronomy which specifically mentions the Curse relating to a debt owed to foreign nations. In my analysis, 'The Clinton Curse' demands the Repeal of Bill Clinton's Slavery Law called PRWORA or The Welfare Reform Act of 1996.
The Clinton Curse. A Balanced Budget vs Foreign Debt.
The Clinton Curse. A Balanced Budget vs Foreign Debt.
The Clinton Curse. A Balanced Budget vs Foreign Debt.
The Clinton Curse. A Balanced Budget vs Foreign Debt.
The Clinton Curse. A Balanced Budget vs Foreign Debt.
The Clinton Curse. A Balanced Budget vs Foreign Debt.
The Clinton Curse. A Balanced Budget vs Foreign Debt.
Here's a headline you might have missed amid the onslaught of news about Julian Assange, William Barr, Nipsey Hussle, and Michael Avenatti: "US budget deficit running 15% higher than a year ago."
The story cites this monthly report from the Treasury Department detailing these few eye-popping facts: 1) The budget deficit grew $146.9 million in the month of March alone. 2) The deficit for this fiscal year is now $691 billion -- a 15% increase (or roughly $100 billion) from where we were at this point in 2018. 3) Treasury is projecting that the deficit will surge over $1 trillion by the end of the fiscal year in September. To which, our politicians have responded: 😒 "Nobody cares," White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney reportedly told a group of Republicans who wondered why President Donald Trump wasn't going to mention the ever-growing deficit in his State of the Union Speech earlier this year. That's a massive change from where Trump, Mulvaney and the rest of the Republican Party were on the dangers of debt and deficits just a few years ago. Here's Trump talking to Sean Hannity in 2016 about how easily he will balance the federal budget: "It can be done. ... It will take place and it will go relatively quickly. ... If you have the right people, like, in the agencies and the various people that do the balancing ... you can cut the numbers by two pennies and three pennies and balance a budget quickly and have a stronger and better country." So, well, it hasn't turned out that way. At all. Here's the kicker: Trump isn't likely to pay a price -- either within his own party or the broader electorate -- for the soaring deficit. Less than 50% of people in a January Pew poll said that lowering the federal deficit should be a top priority of Washington policymakers. That's down, rapidly, from 72% who said the same earlier this decade. The Point: Deficits have lost their salience as a political issue. But that doesn't mean they are going away. And, at some point, our political (and economic) systems will be forced to deal with our growing mountain of debt. -- Chris
How the U.S. Deficit and Debt Are Different?
The U.S. budget deficit was $211 billion in August 2018. That's much lower than the record high of $1.4 trillion reached in FY 2009. The U.S. debt exceeded $22 trillion on February 11, 2019. That's more than triple the $6 trillion debt in 2000.
What is Foreign Debt?
Foreign debt is an outstanding loan or set of loans that one country owes to another country or institutions within that country. Foreign debt also includes obligations to international organizations such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank or Inter-American Development Bank. Total foreign debt can be a combination of short-term and long-term liabilities. Also known as external debt, these outside obligations can be carried by governments, corporations or private households of a country.
In fact, the national debt went from $4.4 Trillion at the end of 1993 to almost $5.7 Trillion at the end of 2000, U.S. Treasury data shows, a 28 percent increase in the debt over this time when our nation supposedly was running a balanced budget. The reason for the confusion is that the reported budget deficit/surplus does not take into account new debt being incurred by the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds and other government loan programs. So, when the budget appeared to have gone down by $69 billion in 1998, the national debt increased by $109 billion, similarly, in 1999, the budget surplus appeared to be $126 billion, the actual national debt rose from just under $5.5 trillion to just over $5.6 trillion.
The Clinton Curse. A Balanced Budget vs Foreign Debt
The Clinton Curse. A Balanced Budget vs Foreign Debt.
ANTISLAVERY CAMPAIGN OF 2018 – SLAVERY LAW OF 1996 – BEHOLD THE MAN
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 - Resist President Clinton's assault on human dignity. Repeal PRWORA Project.
REPEAL PRWORA PROJECT – BEHOLD SENIOR ALIEN
WHERE IS PROTECTION FOR SOCIAL SECURITY RETIREMENT INCOME?
Antislavery Campaign of 2018. Repeal PRWORA Project to resist President Clinton's assault on Old Age Benefits.
THE GREAT AWAKENING MOVEMENT- RESIST SPIRITUAL WICKEDNESS IN HIGH PLACES
Antislavery Campaign of 2018. Repeal PRWORA Project. Wrestle against Spiritual Wickedness.
A NEW BEGINNING IN AUGUST 1996 – ASSAULT ON OLD AGE BENEFITS
Antislavery Campaign of 2018. Repeal PRWORA Project to resist President Clinton's assault on Old Age Benefits.
PRESIDENT CLINTON'S NEW BEGINNING IN 1996 – TRAVESTY OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACT
On August 22, 1996, US President Bill Clinton (Democrat) signed into Law that reintroduced Slavery, Involuntary Servitude, Serfdom and Forced Labor in the pretext of making 'A New Beginning'. Welfare Reform Act or Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) is unjust and unfair for it violates Constitutional Law that defends natural rights of all people living in United States. All US taxpayers must be treated as equals for receiving retirement income benefits for which they paid taxes. President Clinton's action constitutes transgression of President Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation that saved US Non-Citizens or Aliens from burdens of Slavery.
GIVING VOICE TO HIDDEN PROBLEM – TRAVESTY OF EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION
NATURAL LAW vs MAN MADE LAW – SLAVERY IS CONTEMPT OF NATURAL LAW
Antislavery Campaign of 2018. Repeal PRWORA Project. Resist President Clinton's assault on Old Age Retirement Benefits.
US CONGRESS SLAVE DRIVER
I ask my readers to review 43-word 13th Amendment and tell me if those words still govern, rule, and operate the lives of all people, wage earners who perform labor paying taxes.
My readers should not be surprised if I describe US Congress as "Slave Driver." The reason for my claim is based on PRWORA enacted by US Congress in 1996 that amended US Social Security Act of 1935. This legal provision enacted by 104th US Congress is incorporated as Section 202(y) of the Social Security Act. It mandates that no Retirement Income benefits shall be payable to registered alien(non-citizen) taxpayers in the United States without showing proof of lawful residency as determined by the Attorney General. In my view, unexpired Employment Authorization Document (EAD) must not be demanded if worker has attained full retirement age as determined by law.
Social Security Act, Section 202(y) violates the principle enshrined in those 43 words called the 13th Amendment. This 1996 amendment to the Social Security Act is fundamentally flawed for it is unconstitutional. It takes away property rights (earnings, wages and retirement income) of individuals who paid Federal, State, Local, Social Security and Medicare Taxes working in this country to attain full retirement age.
The Emancipation Proclamation issued by President Abraham Lincoln (Republican) in September 1862 came into effect on January 01, 1863 freeing slaves in all territory still at War with the Union. These slaves were not citizens of the Land and had no political rights of their own. In Law, Servitude or Slavery refers to the burden imposed upon property of a person by a specified right another has in its use. Servitude involves labor in which the person who performs labor has no right to his earnings from labor. The Emancipation Proclamation specifically protects, defends, preserves and safeguards rights of aliens or non-citizens residing in the United States.
The amended Social Security Act unconstitutionally gives power to Social Security Administration to withhold property (wages, earnings, monthly retirement income benefits) of alien workers who are not convicted by US Court of Law. In my analysis, Social Security Act of 1935 amended in 1996 does not uphold Constitution as the Supreme Law of this Land.
I ask my readers to make distinction between Social Security Tax and Monthly Retirement Benefit. The first represents tax paid to government and the second represents earning or wage entitled to retired person to provide income and security during old age.
WASHINGTON – Earlier today, at a ceremony in Emancipation Hall of the United States Capitol Visitor Center, President Obama and leaders of Congress commemorated the 150th anniversary of the 13th amendment to the Constitution. Following are House Speaker Paul Ryan's (R-WI) remarks at the ceremony, as prepared for delivery: The Thirteenth Amendment is just 43 words long. It is so short that, when you read it, you can almost miss the whole significance. You have to stop and remind yourself that 600,000 people died in the Civil War—600,000 died over 43 words. Or to be more precise, they died in a war that decided whether those 43 words would ever be written.
Antislavery Campaign of 2018. Repeal PRWORA Project. The Great Awakening Movement.
The Repeal movement exposes President Clinton's contemptuous violation of Constitutional Principles of equal protection, equal justice and equal treatment under Law.
US Social Security Administration must either obtain criminal conviction or designate US taxpayer as "SLAVE" to withhold payment of monthly retirement income benefit of septuagenarian senior alien.
Antislavery Campaign of 2018. Repeal PRWORA Project to defend Old Age Retirement Benefits.
US Congress can levy taxes but cannot deprive any person of Life, Liberty and Property without due process of Law.
Antislavery Campaign of 2018. Repeal PRWORA Project. The Great Awakening Movement to defend human dignity.
ANTISLAVERY CAMPAIGN OF 2018 – SLAVERY LAW OF 1996 – BEHOLD THE MAN
REPEAL PRWORA PROJECT – BEHOLD SENIOR ALIEN
WHERE IS PROTECTION FOR SOCIAL SECURITY RETIREMENT INCOME?
THE GREAT AWAKENING MOVEMENT- RESIST SPIRITUAL WICKEDNESS IN HIGH PLACES
A NEW BEGINNING IN AUGUST 1996 – ASSAULT ON OLD AGE BENEFITS
PRESIDENT CLINTON'S NEW BEGINNING IN 1996 – TRAVESTY OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACT
On August 22, 1996, US President Bill Clinton (Democrat) signed into Law that reintroduced Slavery, Involuntary Servitude, Serfdom and Forced Labor in the pretext of making 'A New Beginning'. Welfare Reform Act or Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) is unjust and unfair for it violates Constitutional Law that defends natural rights of all people living in United States. All US taxpayers must be treated as equals for receiving retirement income benefits for which they paid taxes. President Clinton's action constitutes transgression of President Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation that saved US Non-Citizens or Aliens from burdens of Slavery.
GIVING VOICE TO HIDDEN PROBLEM – TRAVESTY OF EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION
NATURAL LAW vs MAN MADE LAW – SLAVERY IS CONTEMPT OF NATURAL LAW
US CONGRESS SLAVE DRIVER
I ask my readers to review 43-word 13th Amendment and tell me if those words still govern, rule, and operate the lives of all people, wage earners who perform labor paying taxes.
My readers should not be surprised if I describe US Congress as "Slave Driver." The reason for my claim is based on PRWORA enacted by US Congress in 1996 that amended US Social Security Act of 1935. This legal provision enacted by 104th US Congress is incorporated as Section 202(y) of the Social Security Act. It mandates that no Retirement Income benefits shall be payable to registered alien(non-citizen) taxpayers in the United States without showing proof of lawful residency as determined by the Attorney General. In my view, unexpired Employment Authorization Document (EAD) must not be demanded if worker has attained full retirement age as determined by law.
Social Security Act, Section 202(y) violates the principle enshrined in those 43 words called the 13th Amendment. This 1996 amendment to the Social Security Act is fundamentally flawed for it is unconstitutional. It takes away property rights (earnings, wages and retirement income) of individuals who paid Federal, State, Local, Social Security and Medicare Taxes working in this country to attain full retirement age.
The Emancipation Proclamation issued by President Abraham Lincoln (Republican) in September 1862 came into effect on January 01, 1863 freeing slaves in all territory still at War with the Union. These slaves were not citizens of the Land and had no political rights of their own. In Law, Servitude or Slavery refers to the burden imposed upon property of a person by a specified right another has in its use. Servitude involves labor in which the person who performs labor has no right to his earnings from labor. The Emancipation Proclamation specifically protects, defends, preserves and safeguards rights of aliens or non-citizens residing in the United States.
The amended Social Security Act unconstitutionally gives power to Social Security Administration to withhold property (wages, earnings, monthly retirement income benefits) of alien workers who are not convicted by US Court of Law. In my analysis, Social Security Act of 1935 amended in 1996 does not uphold Constitution as the Supreme Law of this Land.
I ask my readers to make distinction between Social Security Tax and Monthly Retirement Benefit. The first represents tax paid to government and the second represents earning or wage entitled to retired person to provide income and security during old age.
WASHINGTON – Earlier today, at a ceremony in Emancipation Hall of the United States Capitol Visitor Center, President Obama and leaders of Congress commemorated the 150th anniversary of the 13th amendment to the Constitution. Following are House Speaker Paul Ryan's (R-WI) remarks at the ceremony, as prepared for delivery: The Thirteenth Amendment is just 43 words long. It is so short that, when you read it, you can almost miss the whole significance. You have to stop and remind yourself that 600,000 people died in the Civil War—600,000 died over 43 words. Or to be more precise, they died in a war that decided whether those 43 words would ever be written.
The Repeal movement exposes President Clinton's contemptuous violation of Constitutional Principles of equal protection, equal justice and equal treatment under Law.
US Social Security Administration must either obtain criminal conviction or designate US taxpayer as "SLAVE" to withhold payment of monthly retirement income benefit of septuagenarian senior alien.
US Congress can levy taxes but cannot deprive any person of Life, Liberty and Property without due process of Law.
ANTISLAVERY CAMPAIGN OF 2018 – SLAVERY LAW OF 1996 – BEHOLD THE MAN
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
REPEAL PRWORA PROJECT – BEHOLD SENIOR ALIEN
WHERE IS PROTECTION FOR SOCIAL SECURITY RETIREMENT INCOME?
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
THE GREAT AWAKENING MOVEMENT- RESIST SPIRITUAL WICKEDNESS IN HIGH PLACES
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
A NEW BEGINNING IN AUGUST 1996 – SLAVERY REBORN
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to resist President Clinton's assault on Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
PRESIDENT CLINTON'S NEW BEGINNING IN 1996 – TRAVESTY OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACT On August 22, 1996, US President Bill Clinton (Democrat) signed into Law that reintroduced Slavery, Involuntary Servitude, Serfdom and Forced Labor in the pretext of making 'A New Beginning'. Welfare Reform Act or Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) is unjust and unfair for it violates Constitutional Law that defends natural rights of all people living in United States. All US taxpayers must be treated as equals for receiving retirement income benefits for which they paid taxes. President Clinton's action constitutes transgression of President Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation that saved US Non-Citizens or Aliens from burdens of Slavery.
GIVING VOICE TO HIDDEN PROBLEM – TRAVESTY OF EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION
NATURAL LAW vs MAN MADE LAW – SLAVERY IS CONTEMPT OF NATURAL LAW
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
US CONGRESS SLAVE DRIVER
I ask my readers to review 43-word 13th Amendment and tell me if those words still govern, rule, and operate the lives of all people, wage earners who perform labor paying taxes.
My readers should not be surprised if I describe US Congress as "Slave Driver." The reason for my claim is based on PRWORA enacted by US Congress in 1996 that amended US Social Security Act of 1935. This legal provision enacted by 104th US Congress is incorporated as Section 202(y) of the Social Security Act. It mandates that no Retirement Income benefits shall be payable to registered alien(non-citizen) taxpayers in the United States without showing proof of lawful residency as determined by the Attorney General. In my view, unexpired Employment Authorization Document (EAD) must not be demanded if worker has attained full retirement age as determined by law.
Social Security Act, Section 202(y) violates the principle enshrined in those 43 words called the 13th Amendment. This 1996 amendment to the Social Security Act is fundamentally flawed for it is unconstitutional. It takes away property rights (earnings, wages and retirement income) of individuals who paid Federal, State, Local, Social Security and Medicare Taxes working in this country to attain full retirement age.
The Emancipation Proclamation issued by President Abraham Lincoln (Republican) in September 1862 came into effect on January 01, 1863 freeing slaves in all territory still at War with the Union. These slaves were not citizens of the Land and had no political rights of their own. In Law, Servitude or Slavery refers to the burden imposed upon property of a person by a specified right another has in its use. Servitude involves labor in which the person who performs labor has no right to his earnings from labor. The Emancipation Proclamation specifically protects, defends, preserves and safeguards rights of aliens or non-citizens residing in the United States.
The amended Social Security Act unconstitutionally gives power to Social Security Administration to withhold property (wages, earnings, monthly retirement income benefits) of alien workers who are not convicted by US Court of Law. In my analysis, Social Security Act of 1935 amended in 1996 does not uphold Constitution as the Supreme Law of this Land.
I ask my readers to make distinction between Social Security Tax and Monthly Retirement Benefit. The first represents tax paid to government and the second represents earning or wage entitled to retired person to provide income and security during old age.
WASHINGTON – Earlier today, at a ceremony in Emancipation Hall of the United States Capitol Visitor Center, President Obama and leaders of Congress commemorated the 150th anniversary of the 13th amendment to the Constitution. Following are House Speaker Paul Ryan's (R-WI) remarks at the ceremony, as prepared for delivery: The Thirteenth Amendment is just 43 words long. It is so short that, when you read it, you can almost miss the whole significance. You have to stop and remind yourself that 600,000 people died in the Civil War—600,000 died over 43 words. Or to be more precise, they died in a war that decided whether those 43 words would ever be written.
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
The Repeal movement exposes President Clinton's contemptuous violation of Constitutional Principles of equal protection, equal justice and equal treatment under Law.
US Social Security Administration must either obtain criminal conviction or designate US taxpayer as "SLAVE" to withhold payment of monthly retirement income benefit of septuagenarian senior alien.
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
US Congress can levy taxes but cannot deprive any person of Life, Liberty and Property without due process of Law.
Antislavery Campaign of 2018/ Defending human dignity and freedom in old age.
ANTISLAVERY CAMPAIGN OF 2018 – SLAVERY LAW OF 1996 – BEHOLD THE FACE OF SUFFERING
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits.
REPEAL PRWORA PROJECT – ECCE HOMO – BEHOLD THE MAN – BEHOLD SENIOR ALIEN
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
WHERE IS PROTECTION FOR SOCIAL SECURITY RETIREMENT INCOME?
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
THE GREAT AWAKENING MOVEMENT- RESIST SPIRITUAL WICKEDNESS IN HIGH PLACES
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
A NEW BEGINNING IN AUGUST 1996 – SLAVERY REBORN
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to resist President Clinton's assault on Old Age Retirement Income Benefits.
PRESIDENT CLINTON'S NEW BEGINNING IN 1996 – TRAVESTY OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACT
On August 22, 1996, US President Bill Clinton (Democrat) signed into Law that reintroduced Slavery, Involuntary Servitude, Serfdom and Forced Labor in the pretext of making 'A New Beginning'. Welfare Reform Act or Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) is unjust and unfair for it violates Constitutional Law that defends natural rights of all people living in United States. All US taxpayers must be treated as equals for receiving retirement income benefits for which they paid taxes. President Clinton's action constitutes transgression of President Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation that saved US Non-Citizens or Aliens from burdens of Slavery.
GIVING VOICE TO HIDDEN PROBLEM – TRAVESTY OF EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION
NATURAL LAW vs MAN MADE LAW – SLAVERY IS CONTEMPT OF NATURAL LAW
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
US CONGRESS SLAVE DRIVER
I ask my readers to review 43-word 13th Amendment and tell me if those words still govern, rule, and operate the lives of all people, wage earners who perform labor paying taxes.
My readers should not be surprised if I describe US Congress as "Slave Driver." The reason for my claim is based on PRWORA enacted by US Congress in 1996 that amended US Social Security Act of 1935. This legal provision enacted by 104th US Congress is incorporated as Section 202(y) of the Social Security Act. It mandates that no Retirement Income benefits shall be payable to registered alien(non-citizen) taxpayers in the United States without showing proof of lawful residency as determined by the Attorney General. In my view, unexpired Employment Authorization Document (EAD) must not be demanded if worker has attained full retirement age as determined by law.
Social Security Act, Section 202(y) violates the principle enshrined in those 43 words called the 13th Amendment. This 1996 amendment to the Social Security Act is fundamentally flawed for it is unconstitutional. It takes away property rights (earnings, wages and retirement income) of individuals who paid Federal, State, Local, Social Security and Medicare Taxes working in this country to attain full retirement age.
The Emancipation Proclamation issued by President Abraham Lincoln (Republican) in September 1862 came into effect on January 01, 1863 freeing slaves in all territory still at War with the Union. These slaves were not citizens of the Land and had no political rights of their own. In Law, Servitude or Slavery refers to the burden imposed upon property of a person by a specified right another has in its use. Servitude involves labor in which the person who performs labor has no right to his earnings from labor. The Emancipation Proclamation specifically protects, defends, preserves and safeguards rights of aliens or non-citizens residing in the United States.
The amended Social Security Act unconstitutionally gives power to Social Security Administration to withhold property (wages, earnings, monthly retirement income benefits) of alien workers who are not convicted by US Court of Law. In my analysis, Social Security Act of 1935 amended in 1996 does not uphold Constitution as the Supreme Law of this Land.
I ask my readers to make distinction between Social Security Tax and Monthly Retirement Benefit. The first represents tax paid to government and the second represents earning or wage entitled to retired person to provide income and security during old age.
WASHINGTON – Earlier today, at a ceremony in Emancipation Hall of the United States Capitol Visitor Center, President Obama and leaders of Congress commemorated the 150th anniversary of the 13th amendment to the Constitution. Following are House Speaker Paul Ryan's (R-WI) remarks at the ceremony, as prepared for delivery: The Thirteenth Amendment is just 43 words long. It is so short that, when you read it, you can almost miss the whole significance. You have to stop and remind yourself that 600,000 people died in the Civil War—600,000 died over 43 words. Or to be more precise, they died in a war that decided whether those 43 words would ever be written.
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to defend Old Age Retirement Income Benefits of US taxpayers.
The Repeal movement exposes President Clinton's contemptuous violation of Constitutional Principles of equal protection, equal justice and equal treatment under Law.
US Social Security Administration must either obtain criminal conviction or designate US taxpayer as "SLAVE" to withhold payment of monthly retirement income benefit of US taxpayer.
US Congress can levy taxes but cannot deprive any person of Life, Liberty and Property without due process of Law.
-
Antislavery Campaign of 2018 to wrestle against Spiritual Wickedness in High Places.
